We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2039
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2039
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the United Liberal Alliance
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the United Liberal Alliance
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the United Liberal Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the United Liberal Alliance
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the United Liberal Alliance
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | Apologies for sumbitting exactly the same Cabinet again, the reason is that the last one should have been passed as it had a majority (of 1) but did not. This I am told could have been due to a bug which has now been fixed. Therefore please vote on this proposal instead. If it still doesn't pass then I will submit a new revised Cabinet - after all the present state of affairs cannot continue, Telamon needs a government!! |
| Date | not recorded | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | im sorry, but in my proposal of 2036 had possitions for u and ur evil allys, yet i dont see one for me, the third largest party, all i ask is defence, as we all know the Libertarians will disband the millitary, so if u wont goodness for telamon, give me thy spot! |
| Date | not recorded | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | the Libertarians will not disband the military whilst I'm Head of State. I can't give you defence but would consider giving you one of either infrastructure, Health or Education |
| Date | not recorded | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | okay, either one will be fine |
| Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | Can the defence be disbanded? I did not know that? And does it matter who is in the government, except that we must have one? |
| Date | not recorded | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | ight, i would like to see a cabinet with just UCA people |
| Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | Not that they'd make a bad cabinet, but they need a majority. We are a parliament after all. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | a fascist parliament |
| Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | 1) There is no fascist parliament. Fascists don't vote, they threaten and fight. 2) Libertarians are not fascists. Fascists try to force everyone into their mold, much like communists. Libertarians want everyone to be free and make the strongest possible interpretation ov freedom, so very much not fascists. 3) "We" did not refer to libertarians only, but to the whole parliament. Otherwise the statement would not have been true. Or maybe you mean you are a fascist? |
| Date | not recorded | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2039 |
| Message | Can I remind the Communists that the purpose of forming a Cabinet is to form a government with a majority. The government parties should be ideologically similar, that is why I chose coalition with the Libertarians, as Communist have a very different ideology, which of course you are absolutely entitled to. It may be necessary in order to pass this proposal to form a national unity government but remember that I have proposed a compromise - that I will support the Communist Party's gun control laws in exchange for them supporting THIS Cabinet proposal (sse Gun Laws thread). The final thing to say is that this talk of 'Fascists' must stop. There are NO Facist parties in Telamon we are very lucky in that respect (look at some of the other nations). The UCA deplores fascism in all its forms and would never enter coalition with a fascist party, we implore all other parties to undertake the same commitment. Therefore this talk of fascists is unhelpful and not conducive to debate. I therefore finally ask the Communist Party will you accept my compromise offer on your Gun laws or not? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 25 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 34 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
| Random quote: "George W. Bush will protect your unborn fetus, then send your grown child to die in war." - Rick Claro |