We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Justice Reform 2534
Details
Submitted by[?]: Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2524
Description[?]:
This is an iniative from the Conservative and Morality Party to help revamp our nations justice system. As our new leader settles into his role and begins to make a name for himself at the head of the party table, it is the role and responsibility of his staff and ministers to ensure that the party is progressing and its keeping it's election promises. In our last election, the CMP promised reform, and that is what we have aimed to do. From the Vehicular Freedom Bill to the Trade and Insustry initiative, the CMP have kep their promise that a range of areas should be looked at. Now, the CMP continues it's promise to restart this nation, to reform this government, and to reenergise Solentian politics, by the introduction of this bill. Looking at our first initiative; as it stands, the law states that national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared. This absolutly intolerable and needless state intervention is simply out of date. This law was imposed by the SRNP years ago as a consolodation of power and has yet to be revoked. This is a stain on our nation and a harsh reminder of the ludacrous administration that once held power. We propose that this rule be dminished, and that the government, eliminate this policy, thus aiding Solentia in the reducation of state interbvention. Secondly, looking carefully at the law regarding malpractise cases, we can clearly see that our health proffesionals are ast risk of loosing their jobs thanks to nanny-style rules that supposedly protect the individual. These cases of malpractice clog up and conject our justice system to a point that people, who have very little or even no medical knowledge are creating hastle in a court of law thanks purely to grief at the loss of a loved one, and at no actual fault of a practising doctor. We now propose that ONYL qualified medical proffesionals have the right to bring such cases forward, thus preventing the contaminiation of the state in needless and mindless bureaucracy. Thus, for a smaller state, for a more individualised people, and for a clearer justice system, please vote FOR this logical and strong legislation. Thank you. - The Rt.Hon.Sen, Gordon Castleford; Shadow Secretary of State for Judicial Affairs. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Current: Local governments may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: Local governments may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Malpractice suits.
Old value:: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Current: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Proposed: Only a medical regulatory body can prosecute a doctor for malpractice.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 164 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 122 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 139 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground." - H.L. Mencken |