We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Notice: Undefined index: EXECUTIVE_LEADER in
/var/www/vhosts/particracy.net/subdomains/classic/httpdocs/viewbill.php on line
234
Bill: The Religious Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: removed
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2040
Description[?]:
| This bill guarantees the religious freedoms of all the Kundrati citizens. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.
Old value:: The government leaves this decision up to the schools themselves.
Current:
Notice: Undefined index: SCHOOL_PRAYER in /var/www/vhosts/particracy.net/subdomains/classic/httpdocs/viewbill.php on line 410
Error: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1 in query SELECT Description FROM choice WHERE Variable = 'SCHOOL_PRAYER' AND Code =
Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /var/www/vhosts/particracy.net/subdomains/classic/httpdocs/database.php on line 33
invalid choiceProposed: Teacher-led prayers in schools are encouraged.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | Some time aga the Rihannsu Party proposed an interesting bill that got 50% of the votes in the Kundrati senate. SInce the numeber of seats changed as well as the parties we would like to see if this bill can pass. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | ooc:The Rihannsu Party created the original bill so if the Rihannsu Party wants it's their right to ask that they propose the revised bill. So if they want we will redraw the proposal to let them submit it.They just need to say so. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | This bill by no means forces kids to pray if they don't want to also by no means forces the teachers to prat with the kids. What it does is NOT allow any school to ban prayers.That's why it's religious fredoom bill. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | The rule is not broken: the government doesn't decide which religion the pupils pray. The government just encourages pupils and teachers to think about something larger then life, which is a good thing. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | Kundrati Revolutionary Movement | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | Encouraging teachers to lead prayers is to invest the authority of the state into the promotion of a particular religion - a clear violation of everything the principle of religious freedom stands for. Additionally, the nature of the institution of school and the authority granted to teachers combined with the young age of those being led in these prayers constitutes a form of coercion. The law as it currently stands is bad enough - to actively encourage teacher led prayers is unconscionable. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | "Encouraging teachers to lead prayers is to invest the authority of the state into the promotion of a particular religion" What religion?
"Additionally, the nature of the institution of school and the authority granted to teachers combined with the young age of those being led in these prayers constitutes a form of coercion" Can you plase make the differnce between encouraged and forced. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | "The law as it currently stands is bad enough" SO you want religion banned? |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | "to actively encourage teacher led prayers is unconscionable." Plase read the proposed article again and again then one more time. Now tell me where the word "Actively" is!!! |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | @ L D: Agnostic? As in you believe that nothing can be know about God and the afterlife(that's what i read in the dictionary)? And if so then you are not an atheist . We the C.F.P. can tell you that this doesn't brake the separation of Church and state. The most you can say is that the bill CAN be intrepreted as acknowledgement that religion does more good than harm. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | LD: Ca you answer me sicerily to this: Do you feel that this bill is disrespectful towards your religios belifs ? Not the idea of separation but your religios beliefs? IF so then please say so and we will redraw the bill. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the The Religious Freedom Act | | Message | it is not disrespectful to my religious beliefs. But is against my principles. I understand that you think that separation of church and state is not broken with this law but I do. That is why I appose it |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 0 |
| no | Total Seats: 137 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "You don't have to buy from anyone. You don't have to work at any particular job. You don't have to participate in any given relationship. You can choose." - Harry Browne |