Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 02:19:24
Server time: 01:40:35, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Neo_kami | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Acte de âge de retraite, 2525

Details

Submitted by[?]: Front Canrillaise

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2527

Description[?]:

The age of retirement needs to be raised to make people work longer and ease up on the nation's pension system. This bill will also be beneficial for those who want or need to work longer for financial reasons.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:16:30, February 02, 2008 CET
FromParti Radical et Radical-Socialiste
ToDebating the Acte de âge de retraite, 2525
MessageWhile the PRRS agrees with the idea, the age increase is too sudden and too rapid, maybe an increase of a year or two would be reasonable, but 15 years all at once is over the top.

Date23:36:59, February 02, 2008 CET
FromPartie Démocratique Libéral
ToDebating the Acte de âge de retraite, 2525
MessageSeconded. We would support an increase of no more then 5 years.

Date04:15:23, February 03, 2008 CET
FromFront Nationaliste Royaliste
ToDebating the Acte de âge de retraite, 2525
MessageWe support a gradual increase something along this schedule:

2526: 62
2528: 64
2530: 66
2532: 68
2534: 70

Date15:43:22, February 03, 2008 CET
FromPartie Démocratique Libéral
ToDebating the Acte de âge de retraite, 2525
Message...but that's effectively just the same as the sudden increase! Someone scheduled to retire at 60 in 2526 would just have it moved ahead of them two years at a time for ten years. If you want to do it gradually, it would have to be a two-year increase passed every FOUR years.

-"Kitty" Eleclair
Ministre de santé et de services sociaux

Date19:48:02, February 03, 2008 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Acte de âge de retraite, 2525
MessageThen we should stick with 65 and then revisit the issue in a decade's time.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 95

no
  

Total Seats: 103

abstain
   

Total Seats: 105


Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Random quote: "I think you should defend to the death their right to march, and then go down and meet them with baseball bats." - Woody Allen, on the Ku Klux Klan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58