We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Radical Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: NWO Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2528
Description[?]:
| For a Fair and just socuety for all |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on advertising
Old value:: All advertising is permitted.
Current: Only advertising that meets certain set standards is permitted.
Proposed: Only advertising that meets certain set standards is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: Health care is private, but is paid for by the state for people with low incomes.
Current: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Proposed: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government subsidises the cost of pharmaceutical drugs for people on low incomes.
Current: The government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens.
Proposed: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:25:47, February 05, 2008 CET | From | NWO Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Radical Reform Act |
| Message | 1-Why should anyone pay for medical care that could save their lifes? 2-To stop false advertising that misleads our noble citizens 3-Same as 1, basicaly. |
| Date | 13:58:32, February 06, 2008 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Radical Reform Act |
| Message | Well i agree on Advertisement proposal. But if we pay all the pharmaceutical drugs for citizens, we will have to use too much money. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 636 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 114 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Patriotism is in political life what faith is in religion." - John Dalberg-Acton |