We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PUA Tenno power bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2528
Description[?]:
| More of a poll on where we all stand on this issue than anything else. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:29:53, February 06, 2008 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | We have recently been convinced that since the Tenno is voted on directly, it is more directly democratic, assuming all candidates inform the electorate of their cabinet preferences, to allow the Tenno to make the cabinet. It will then mean that the electorate is voting more directly on a cabinet. |
| Date | 21:02:53, February 06, 2008 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | We concur on that sentiment |
| Date | 23:04:11, February 06, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | OOC: I think its time the tenno actualy gets a non-rp perk. |
| Date | 00:21:44, February 07, 2008 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | OOC: We agree. if only the RPP would not abstain :( |
| Date | 00:36:21, February 07, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | Funny how the FDP voted against this when they were the largest party, but votes for it now that they're not. |
| Date | 03:14:45, February 07, 2008 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | GAH!!! SSSSSSSSSSOOOOOOOO close to a pass. We urge the DSP to see that the majority of the legislature wants the change, and to change it's vote, even if nothing more than a gesture of good faith to their peers in the legislature |
| Date | 07:43:44, February 07, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | We're not changing our vote. We have had the same position on the issue since 2451 (77 years) and do not intend to change it, regardless of if we are the largest party or not. |
| Date | 21:30:06, February 07, 2008 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | "Funny how the FDP voted against this when they were the largest party, but votes for it now that they're not." We're not the Tenno either, so your argument is moot. We've been convinced of the merits of giving the Tenno power by the NPP. |
| Date | 07:04:53, February 08, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PUA Tenno power bill |
| Message | DSP, if you're not going to write an article about this for the SNN, we might have to: Something with a headline like "In popular referendum, 67% of Sekowo supports empowering Tenno. Despite widespread popular support, Socialist and Communist parties refuge to budge" Right now, 67% of the vote, and 75% of the parties of Sekowo support the change. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 475 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 247 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 28 |
| Random fact: Terra, the fictional world in which Particracy is set, consists of 8 continents: Artania, Dovani, Keris, Makon, Majatra, Seleya, Temania and Vascania. |
| Random quote: "I am thankful for the taxes I pay because it means that I'm employed." - Nancie J. Carmody |