We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Executive (Police) Devolution Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2532
Description[?]:
An act to disband the national police force. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the organization of police/law enforcement
Old value:: There is a national police department funded by the national government and there are local police departments, funded by local governments.
Current: There is a national police department funded by the national government and there are local police departments, funded by local governments.
Proposed: The operation and funding of the police is left to local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:14:06, February 13, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Executive (Police) Devolution Act |
Message | There is an unnecessary duplication of resources in having a national police force and local police forces. Local police are entirely capable of dealing with any matters. There will be an argument made by the Rightist Party that "what about matters than span regional boundaries - there will be disagreement on jurisdiction". The local police forces are more than capable of working with each other. The fact that they are funded by different territory governments doesn't mean they will lose site of the bigger picture of enforcing the law. This argument will be followed by "what about specialists". Again, police forces can share. We have faith in them. |
Date | 14:14:57, February 13, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Executive (Police) Devolution Act |
Message | No. |
Date | 23:12:50, February 14, 2008 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Executive (Police) Devolution Act |
Message | Current law suits much better, leaves room to manages things at their right level |
Date | 02:22:16, February 15, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Executive (Police) Devolution Act |
Message | support I never would have guessed there was any support for this bill either we already have a national police force. it is called the military |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 227 | |||
no | Total Seats: 200 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 73 |
Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
Random quote: "The trouble with communism is the communists, just as the trouble with Christianity is the Christians" - Henry Louis Mencken |