We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: More Bills to Propose and Consider bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: JDW Tukarali Greens Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2532
Description[?]:
| more possible proposals for each party who could oppose that? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 6
Current: 50
Proposed: 7
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:41:28, February 14, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the More Bills to Propose and Consider bill |
| Message | more possible proposals for each party who could oppose that? |
| Date | 12:09:56, February 14, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the More Bills to Propose and Consider bill |
| Message | We oppose. As we have said countless times before, increasing this limit allows parties to pop up and propose a swathe of bills at once, and then do nothing for the rest of the term. By having a low limit, parties must come back often. |
| Date | 13:38:41, February 14, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the More Bills to Propose and Consider bill |
| Message | You have our support. |
| Date | 21:36:37, February 14, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the More Bills to Propose and Consider bill |
| Message | And it is of no surprise that the JUP opposes this. We all know he does not approve of actually having activity. And no. Parties do not have to come back often. They can propose bills and leave them for as long as they want to. |
| Date | 02:43:07, February 15, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the More Bills to Propose and Consider bill |
| Message | ditto RP the goal is to leave bills out there long enough to be debated, not to be restricted from introducing bills |
| Date | 02:47:25, February 15, 2008 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the More Bills to Propose and Consider bill |
| Message | Aw hell no. That's the same damn reason I gave for shortening the term. |
| Date | 00:45:04, February 16, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the More Bills to Propose and Consider bill |
| Message | Doesn't matter. Its been defeated because we do not have the 2/3rds necessary to pass it even though the majority of the Tribal Council approves of it. |
| Date | 01:07:56, February 17, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the More Bills to Propose and Consider bill |
| Message | I wonder why the NUA opposes this since they rarely introduce bills themselves??? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 293 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 207 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365 |
| Random quote: "Hunger makes a thief of any man." - Pearl S. Buck |