Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 02:10:22
Server time: 09:49:37, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Animals (Wild Animal Ownership) Devolution Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2533

Description[?]:

An act to devolve to local governments responsibility for regulating wild animal ownership.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:40:38, February 14, 2008 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Animals (Wild Animal Ownership) Devolution Act
MessageWe currently require people to register domestic animals with their local governments. And that is right, for safety reasons. It stands to reason that wild animals would be regulated the same way. Local governments are best able to craft law to deal with the specific needs of their territory.

Date13:31:55, February 14, 2008 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Animals (Wild Animal Ownership) Devolution Act
MessageNot even bothering

Date02:53:49, February 15, 2008 CET
FromJDW Tukarali Greens Party
ToDebating the Animals (Wild Animal Ownership) Devolution Act
Messageoppose

unless we want to establish it is already tribal custom in some regions to keep "dangerous" wild animals

Date02:55:24, February 15, 2008 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Animals (Wild Animal Ownership) Devolution Act
MessageThis is not about custom, it is about consistency. Domestic animals are regulated by local governments, it stands to reason that other animals would be too.

Date12:12:10, February 16, 2008 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Animals (Wild Animal Ownership) Devolution Act
MessageCurrent law is fine, we don't want to have the locals to determine this. For goodness sake, they could allow all wild animals to be kept as pets without any restrictions or precautions whatsoever for exmple. I wouldn't be too happy if my neighboor keeps a lion in a poorly constructed hen house in his backyard, if my children are playing outside.

Date00:51:36, February 17, 2008 CET
FromJDW Tukarali Greens Party
ToDebating the Animals (Wild Animal Ownership) Devolution Act
MessageJUP - domestic animals are regulated (required to be registered)

I proposed a bill to stop this and I believe every single party voted against it, including yours

Date01:06:45, February 17, 2008 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Animals (Wild Animal Ownership) Devolution Act
Messagedefeated

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 172

no
     

Total Seats: 328

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

    Random quote: "You don't have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight." - Barry Goldwater

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 63