Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 00:56:03
Server time: 15:03:56, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): AethanKal | ImperialLodamun | johndoe1322 | JWDL | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2108

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2109

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:13:33, September 09, 2005 CET
FromLodamun Centre-Left Coalition
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2108
MessageEvery single (active) party is included. Would this be feasible?

Date09:47:45, September 09, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2108
MessageYes

Date22:11:38, September 09, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2108
MessageOpposed, an Inclusive Cabinet is pointless unless it is enshrined in law, as soon as we lose power the Capitalists will not try to compromise their power by offering us cabinet positions.

Date14:30:31, September 10, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2108
MessageIn the light of this proposal not even attracting comment from the parties on the right, we're likely to vote against but will refrain from voting either way until later.

Date18:11:15, September 10, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2108
MessageWe are willing to support this if the Conservatives and TIC want this sort of cabinet. If they do not, of course, we will vote no: we would not wish to press any party into cabinet that had not agreed to serve.

Date18:49:37, September 10, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2108
MessageI agree to serve in this cabinet if the other parties are willing. However I feel that, as no "balanced" cabinets were passed under our majority(some were proposed, but not passed for whatever reasons), that there is no reason for TiC to be included in such a cabinet. The liberals of Lodamun have sat on the sidelines for quite some time, now it's their turn to play.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 101

no
   

Total Seats: 113

abstain
   

Total Seats: 58


Random fact: By default the head of government is the ultimate authority within a national government. In general terms, heads of government are expected to consult with cabinet colleagues (including those from other parties) before making significant decisions but they remain responsible for government action.

Random quote: "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river." Nikita Khrushchev (1894 - 1971)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72