Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 02:16:26
Server time: 17:43:33, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | lulus | Mity1 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: DSP.071.2532 (Restoring Personal Freedoms)

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2533

Description[?]:

No aspect of the government, local or Federal has the right to tell people what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:06:23, February 16, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the DSP.071.2532 (Restoring Personal Freedoms)
MessageNnnn, no, non, nein, nage, 不会!

Date01:09:27, February 16, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the DSP.071.2532 (Restoring Personal Freedoms)
Message(That last, which showed up fine here, but didn't post, was "b hu" in characters.

Date01:11:28, February 16, 2008 CET
From Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the DSP.071.2532 (Restoring Personal Freedoms)
MessageWe support

Date06:35:30, February 16, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the DSP.071.2532 (Restoring Personal Freedoms)
MessageWe oppose.

Date22:12:42, February 16, 2008 CET
From Revolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the DSP.071.2532 (Restoring Personal Freedoms)
MessageI think we will just abstain.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 269

no
   

Total Seats: 357

abstain
  

Total Seats: 124


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "In any country there must be people who have to die. They are the sacrifices any nation has to make to achieve law and order." - Idi Amin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71