Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 02:34:44
Server time: 05:25:15, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): burgerboys | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Solentia-Wantuni Friendship Pact

Details

Submitted by[?]: Solentian People Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2533

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Solentia-Wantuni Friendship Pact. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:25:53, February 17, 2008 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Solentia-Wantuni Friendship Pact
MessageWith the imminent failure of the treaty's ratification the DLP began to consider proposing the formation of a committee to hash out a new agreement between Solentia and Wantuni -- one that would be more agreeable to all of Solentia's parties. It has since occured to us that it may not make sense for our foreign relations to be so stringently defined by a war that happened centuries ago, tragic though it was. Rather it may make more sense for us to attempt to draft a treaty that could be ratified by Solentia and all its bordering nations.

What do the other parties think about these two ideas? Is there a preference?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 202

no
  

Total Seats: 223

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: "Modern technology owes ecology an apology." - Alan M. Eddison

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37