Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 01:49:31
Server time: 14:10:28, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): albaniansunited | itsjustgav | lulus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Loyalistische Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2535

Description[?]:

...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:28:13, February 20, 2008 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageIf we capture an enemy soldier, who raped and murdered civilian women, we should punish him like we would do to our own criminals. Death Penalty is not aproved in international standards and if they are given to their own court, they may never be put to face their crimes. Our laws are good enough for them.

Date14:55:47, February 20, 2008 CET
FromJewish-Christian Alliance of Patriots
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageThat is not what a PoW is. A PoW is simply a soldier who surrendered

Date16:59:43, February 20, 2008 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageWhat stops him from being both? And if he is both, which regulations should we follow, our own for murderers and rapists or the international standards for pows? And if we follow our own, the enemy nation can use that against us with the fact that we have broken the international standards we have agreed on. And if we consider them pows, criminals go unpunsihed. Our laws are good enough for our enemies, international treaties and standdards should not weaken us.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 149

no
    

Total Seats: 151

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber." - Plato

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 49