We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Snake eyes
Details
Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2111
Description[?]:
Casinos provide income to both the government and thousands of employees. Their ban has cripped the economy of some of our regions whcih rely on foreign Py generated by these buisnesses. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Only small-scale gambling is allowed, involving limited amounts of money; casinos are illegal.
Current: Gambling is legal, but only in private homes and casinos with special licences.
Proposed: Gambling is legal, but only in private homes and casinos with special licences.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:28:31, September 09, 2005 CET | From | Social Republican Party | To | Debating the Snake eyes |
Message | Sure! |
Date | 03:37:29, September 10, 2005 CET | From | Social and Labour Reform Party | To | Debating the Snake eyes |
Message | We would support this. |
Date | 02:07:58, September 12, 2005 CET | From | LibCom Party | To | Debating the Snake eyes |
Message | Casinos prey on the poor and desperate. We cannot support this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 50 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 31 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 19 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution." - Emma Goldman |