Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 01:21:26
Server time: 10:38:33, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): hnp19 | Kiwiis | MyungLuth | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of 2535

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2536

Description[?]:

A new cabinet for a new legislature.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:05:31, February 22, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageWe dislike losing a seat in the cabinet, but we will certainly be glad to discuss this cabinet proposal.

Date15:49:32, February 22, 2008 CET
FromPeasant Party Of Sekowo
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageThis is unacceptable. We have worked together on many proposals in the past, and the Democratic Socialist Party decides its policies on its personal feelings than the political well being of the country.

Date15:49:55, February 22, 2008 CET
FromPeasant Party Of Sekowo
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageLeftist Unity is undermined by Individual's own hatred.

Date19:48:49, February 22, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageThe DSP has never worked with the PPS on anything.
Voting on bills in a similiar fashion does not represent working together.

Date20:58:58, February 22, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageI would suggest everyone represented vote yes.
Otherwise I'll transfer some positions to IC when he's reactivated. (Before he has any seats that is)

Date01:58:42, February 23, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageOh, so he's comming back for sure, I know he was asking me about it. Good to see the most reasonable rightist return.

Date03:15:16, February 23, 2008 CET
FromPan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
Messagesecond most resonable rightist....

:P

Date04:02:42, February 23, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageDSP, would you kindly remind us again why you have removed one of our seats, and, more importantly, disenfranchised the Free Democratic Party in this cabinet? We would like to vote yes, but our conscious is making this difficult without clear and reasonable answers to these questions.

Date04:25:20, February 23, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageWe have excluded the FDP because they did the same to us and because we do not consider them capable.

You have lost one seat since we are trying to proportion seats based on party size somewhat.
We're experimenting with new ways to create cabinets.

Date04:43:19, February 23, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageDSP | 113 | 3 seats
SCP | 84 | 4 seats
NPP | 76 | 2 seats
CP | 71 | 2 seats
USMC | 47 | 2 seats

No very proportional, DSP.

Date04:48:24, February 23, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageWell we didi say partially proportional, not fully.

Date07:58:00, February 23, 2008 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageOOC: It's worth noting that two of our seats are basically useless. Also, we would prefer finance to FA.

Date08:57:40, February 23, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageWhy is it that the DSP considers the FDP incapable? If I recall correctly, the FDP did not include the DSP in its last cabinet because the DSP chose (with no reason given) to exclude them out of the DSP's previous cabinet.

It's a vicious cycle, and we'd like to see an end to it.

Date17:39:29, February 23, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageOOC: To SCP, perhaps two of your four seats are useless, but two out of two of my seats are useless except for RP.

Date18:38:18, February 23, 2008 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2535
MessageThe FDP considers itself reasonable. We support a social safety net while also maintaining a far more socially liberal stance than the other parties of the right.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 231

no
    

Total Seats: 293

abstain
 

Total Seats: 76


Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 86