Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 01:33:30
Server time: 18:26:29, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): albaniansunited | Caoimhean | MyungJak | Paulo Nogueira | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: International/Social Relations

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2537

Description[?]:

Implementing policy for more cohesive social- and international relations.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:02:57, February 23, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the International/Social Relations
MessageHell no.

Date17:49:43, February 24, 2008 CET
FromGeneral Confederation of Labour
ToDebating the International/Social Relations
MessageWe have to change article 2

Date19:42:37, February 24, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
ToDebating the International/Social Relations
MessageWe enquire how the RCM intends to enforce positive discrimination quotas without knowing the requisite figures. Furthermore, we consider the registration of a religious preference a good way for determining policy to stamp religion out once and for all.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 235

no
    

Total Seats: 325

abstain
 

Total Seats: 106


Random fact: Voters have an extra appreciation for bills that actually get passed, so if you want to maximally take profit from your votes, make sure you compromise with others.

Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 89