We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Amending unnecessary surpluses and excesses
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2537
Description[?]:
| The Democratic Workers' Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Axis Mundi Likatonian Res Publica. |
Proposals
Article 1
| Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
| Head of Government | 8,468,962 LIK | 55,000,000 LIK | 55,000,000 LIK |
| Foreign Affairs | 2,117,240,580 LIK | 1,000,000,000 LIK | 1,000,000,000 LIK |
| Internal Affairs | 7,622,066,087 LIK | 5,000,000,000 LIK | 5,000,000,000 LIK |
| Finance | 4,234,481,159 LIK | 5,000,000,000 LIK | 5,000,000,000 LIK |
| Defence | 12,703,443,478 LIK | 50,000,000,000 LIK | 50,000,000,000 LIK |
| Justice | 5,928,273,623 LIK | 50,000,000,000 LIK | 50,000,000,000 LIK |
| Infrastructure and Transport | 9,315,858,550 LIK | 10,000,000,000 LIK | 10,000,000,000 LIK |
| Health and Social Services | 11,856,547,246 LIK | 25,000,000,000 LIK | 75,000,000,000 LIK |
| Education and Culture | 8,468,962,319 LIK | 25,000,000,000 LIK | 75,000,000,000 LIK |
| Science and Technology | 6,775,169,855 LIK | 30,000,000,000 LIK | 30,000,000,000 LIK |
| Food and Agriculture | 5,081,377,391 LIK | 5,000,000,000 LIK | 5,000,000,000 LIK |
| Environment and Tourism | 4,657,929,275 LIK | 100,000,000 LIK | 10,000,000,000 LIK |
| Trade and Industry | 5,919,804,661 LIK | 20,000,000,000 LIK | 20,000,000,000 LIK |
| Total | 84,689,623,186 LIK | 226,155,000,000 LIK | 336,055,000,000 LIK |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:03:38, February 23, 2008 CET | From |  Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Amending unnecessary surpluses and excesses |
| Message | No. Justice and Defence need the money more... |
| Date | 19:13:01, February 23, 2008 CET | From | PFL Irish Party | To | Debating the Amending unnecessary surpluses and excesses |
| Message | But why vote no? A no vote will not give them more money.... |
| Date | 19:27:30, February 23, 2008 CET | From | Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Amending unnecessary surpluses and excesses |
| Message | But it will remove the surplus, thus removing the need to put the money somewhere more useful. |
| Date | 07:46:07, February 24, 2008 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Amending unnecessary surpluses and excesses |
| Message | This seems perfectly reasonable. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 378 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 55 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 233 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |