We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Segregation of military and police force.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mindtakin' Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2537
Description[?]:
Provided we have a compatent police force, there should by no means be necessary reason for the military to be called upon when lacking in a situation of extreme emergencies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:59:37, February 23, 2008 CET | From | Mindtakin' Party | To | Debating the Segregation of military and police force. |
Message | I agree! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 95 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 181 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 219 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago." - George Porter |