We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Decentralization of Forestry
Details
Submitted by[?]: Tukarali Popular Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2538
Description[?]:
| We believe in the protection of our nature. But there is no point for the central government dealing with this, we believe the tribal territories are better fit to figure out what is worth preserving and what is financially needed to be used on commercial basis. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Proposed: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:18:04, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | Leaning to support |
| Date | 00:59:20, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | We'll oppose. |
| Date | 01:50:56, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 07:45:21, February 25, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | oppose I hear the chainsaws getting ready for more clearcuts in Tukarali why keep the forests around for our children if someone who bribes the gov can cut them all down for a quick buck? |
| Date | 13:21:23, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | WE need to protect our forests for the forests help clean the air of Carbon Dioxide and releases oxygen into the Atmosphere. |
| Date | 16:15:05, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | If JUP votes as he says, this will pass |
| Date | 16:18:39, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | Which means, our environment will not be very well protected at all which is a crime shame. |
| Date | 21:44:37, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | It will be protected. The local governments have as much reason to protect forests as the nation government. More so, in fact. |
| Date | 23:11:47, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Decentralization of Forestry |
| Message | No they don't have as much reason to protect forests as the national government. Less so in fact. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 287 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 170 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 43 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks |