We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Monarchy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ingsoc Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2538
Description[?]:
We propose a new, constant, national leader. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Proposed: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: President
Current: His Imperial and Most Excellent Royal Majesty, Alexander III of House Steuart-Carmichael, King and Monarch of Hutori, High Chieftain of the Mashacara People, Prince of Orange-Vilyan, Vanuku, Dolgava, Lourenne, Kazullia & Dorvik, Grand Duke of Geharon & Iztapalata, Duke of Stormkapp, Karzon, Carolleux & Bellemont, Count of Ackerly, Lord Sovereign of the Order of the Golden Lion, Supreme Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, Defender of the Constitution and the Faith, as Represented in Hutori, in Service of the People, the Duly Elected Right Honourable President of the Commonwealth
Proposed: King
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:53:15, February 25, 2008 CET | From | Viktor Schmöller Collective | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | Although we do, regarding that Hutori had a long and famous tradition of a monarchy, favour a renaissance of a hereditary HoS, the title for the same would be rather ridiculous. Also, we won't accept any young lad as a king. |
Date | 00:02:36, February 26, 2008 CET | From | Ingsoc Movement | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | Then for now we will support a monarchy. Big Brother will have to wait until after the revolution is complete. |
Date | 00:06:13, February 26, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | Surely not another contender for the throne? The House of Goodliffe has been fighting for its rights for generations, the House of Waffles has held the throne for many years. |
Date | 00:06:15, February 26, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | Surely not another contender for the throne? The House of Goodliffe has been fighting for its rights for generations, the House of Waffles has held the throne for many years. |
Date | 00:42:49, February 26, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Union | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | Over our dead bodies. |
Date | 00:47:46, February 26, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | It could be arranged... |
Date | 01:37:55, February 26, 2008 CET | From | Metek-to-Shei Movement | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | We would not have it. |
Date | 10:21:41, February 26, 2008 CET | From | "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | We will only accept a monarchy with the legitimate king of the Waffles family, Harry I. And we'd prefer the old title "Most Royal And Serene Majesty, King"... |
Date | 12:21:28, February 26, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | You have to be elected President first mate. ;-) |
Date | 14:09:36, February 26, 2008 CET | From | Viktor Schmöller Collective | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | We agree with Le Chaim. |
Date | 15:36:14, February 26, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | The Waffles claim to the throne is no more legitimate than the Goodliffes. |
Date | 19:12:51, February 26, 2008 CET | From | Groene ArbeidersPartij | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | Wow dudes. Coolness! Wait .. Maybe we could call him 'God' ! |
Date | 20:16:03, February 26, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Nationalists Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | If this is passed then prepare for uproar from DNP supporters. We will never allow another King to take his place in Hutori. |
Date | 20:40:56, February 26, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | (or Queen, now lets not be sexist :P ) Well my supporters wont rest until the House of Goodliffe is given their true rights as ruling family! |
Date | 22:05:49, February 26, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Union | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | Take our word for it, passing this bill will almost certainly spark a civil war. |
Date | 00:17:08, February 27, 2008 CET | From | Ingsoc Movement | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | We support the Goodliffe claim to the throne. Believe it or not, their rightful place on the throne will even benefit the Ingsoc Movement. |
Date | 01:51:44, February 27, 2008 CET | From | Viktor Schmöller Collective | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | We can also arrange ourselves with a Goodliffe king. |
Date | 02:13:08, February 27, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy |
Message | unfortunately we must wait until a Goodlife holds the title President at least. But the people will hear us from this proposal, we want a monarchy, and the true ruling family is the Goodliffe family! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 95 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 206 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx |