We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Child Welfare Act (2537)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Workers Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2540
Description[?]:
An Act to ensure that the bulk of the program goes to children in need, we propose that the child benefit be tied to income, with consideration given to the number of children in the family. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Current: The state guarantees child benefit to both low-income families and large families.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to families classified as low-income or poor.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:44:12, February 27, 2008 CET |
From | Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Child Welfare Act (2537) | Message | If you mean their financial support, some do not.
ooc: Ever seen an episode of My Super Sweet 16 on MTV? These are kids that never needed government welfare. Proper education, yes - but welfare, no. |
Date | 06:52:44, February 28, 2008 CET |
From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Child Welfare Act (2537) | Message | ooc: even when I have TV (like in hotels and such) I just watch C-Span or PBS. Commercial/pop culture stuff like MTV is what I hate the most. I was willing to put up w it until I had kids, but they deserve better. |
Date | 21:53:27, February 28, 2008 CET |
From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Child Welfare Act (2537) | Message | ooc: I completely agree, I like documentaries and such. MTV used to be better (but still not good) when it was a music video station, but now it's just propaganda from hollywood/new york and their godless anti-culture. |
Date | 11:01:19, February 29, 2008 CET |
From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Child Welfare Act (2537) | Message | ooc: Prob is you might be getting the worldwide service which has a commercial arm/branch, auntie beebs home service doesn't and they get blasted at by Parliament and refused funding if they're biased. |
Date | 16:34:00, February 29, 2008 CET |
From | Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Child Welfare Act (2537) | Message | ooc: I think if this bill was a resolution that MTV sucks and that TV of late is of poor quality, it would pass unanimously. |
Date | 00:50:56, March 01, 2008 CET |
From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Child Welfare Act (2537) | Message | ooc: I learned that in History.. Even by choosing words you are being biased in some way. But there is no financial or political motivation behind their news. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 224 |
no | Total Seats: 392 |
abstain | Total Seats: 134 |
Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
Random quote: "I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it." -
Niccolo Machiavelli |