We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pharmaceutical Drugs Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2110
Description[?]:
| We believe that the state should help those on poor incomes to ensure that they have access to the treatments and drugs which they may need. We also believe that the government hould makr available funding to assist in drugs research in order to ensure that Telamon is a world leader in drugs research |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The research and development of pharmaceutical drugs.
Old value:: The government neither subsidizes research and development of drugs nor regulates their prices.
Current: The government subsidizes research and development of prescription drugs and regulates their prices.
Proposed: The government subsidizes research and development of prescription drugs but does not regulate their prices.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government does not subsidise the cost of pharmaceutical drugs at all.
Current: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Proposed: The government subsidises the cost of pharmaceutical drugs for people on low incomes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:38:43, September 10, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Act |
| Message | Am happy to discuss and/or change both proposals (within reason)depending on what people feel. Have a look at the alternatives and see for yourself |
| Date | 00:54:51, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Act |
| Message | I can agree to these. |
| Date | 03:42:48, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Act |
| Message | I was thinking more along the lines of providing free medication to those with low incomes...but i suppose this is fine as well. |
| Date | 11:22:18, September 11, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Act |
| Message | I can change it if people really want? |
| Date | 18:36:34, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Act |
| Message | I agree with C. Those who can't afford the drugs rarely have a job that has suplimental health insurance, so this make perfect sense |
| Date | 10:41:00, September 12, 2005 CET | From | Telemon Lutheran Party | To | Debating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Act |
| Message | This is reasonable |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 203 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 52 |
| Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
| Random quote: "Apparently, a democracy is a place where numerous elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable candidates." - Gore Vidal |