Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:47:29
Server time: 12:12:30, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): JWBa | Vegaverde | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia

Details

Submitted by[?]: Supporters of Science in Design (IP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2539

Description[?]:

"00:45:16, February 29, 2008 CET
From Federalist Party
To Debating the Military Readyness Act.
Message ah, roleplaying.

Dear fellow parties,

The previous attack from Maliva on innocent diplomats was unjust, but we must keep calm. We propose to set up an embargo on them, deport all merchants from that nation, and send battleships near their seas to show that we don't look kindly on dictators."

They seek to send their navy after us!

Their current defense spending is roughly equivalent to 25 billion MCR (after using the currency exchange rates: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/rates.php)

This temporary increase to our defense funding must be passed to give us enough resources to build up a fleet to defend ourselves.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:48:42, February 29, 2008 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageOur current revenue is: 70,663,844,440 MCR. That already puts us in the red at -37,945,560 MCR annually.

The Malivia Democratic Party will not support increasing our national debt further just because some parties want to be warmongerers.

Date07:49:55, February 29, 2008 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageForgot to mention, your other proposed increase in taxes to compensate for this is absolutely ludicrous.

Date08:21:13, February 29, 2008 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageWe are currently -6,867,439 in deficit. We are curious as to where your other figure comes from.

Furthermore, if there is any good reason to go into debt, it is to defend one's national sovereignty. Unless you would prefer this becoming the Malivian Republic of Indrala...

Date14:33:25, February 29, 2008 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageThe figures have changed since last night. We currently have a 25 mil surplus.

http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/budget.php?nationid=14

Date23:18:53, February 29, 2008 CET
FromThe Counsel of The People's Movement
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageParty's of Malivia, I the Foreign Minister, Ambassador J. Laweson have come to submit to diplomatic talks. Do you accept me into the nation or should I close my last Embassy? You have two months to comply otherwise I must see to it we close off all diplomatic relations until your government is further stable from a communist dictator.

Signed,
J. Laweson, FM of Indrala

Date00:09:14, March 01, 2008 CET
FromSoviet Party (Trotskyist)
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageOOC: I don't know what's going on. Are we at war with Indrala or something?

Date00:26:25, March 01, 2008 CET
FromMilitarist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageOOC: He did something where your party attacked the Cabinet Coalition parties. How can you not know?

Date00:31:36, March 01, 2008 CET
FromSoviet Party (Trotskyist)
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageOOC: What do you mean, "he did something"? My party was the attacker.

Date03:06:31, March 01, 2008 CET
FromMilitarist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageOOC: Yeah, so how do you not know why we're at odds with him?

Date04:39:44, March 01, 2008 CET
FromSoviet Party (Trotskyist)
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageOOC: This is getting too confusing. What's "something"? Who's "him"? What's going on? Can you start from the beginning?

Date14:51:13, March 01, 2008 CET
FromMilitarist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal to fund the defense of Malivia
MessageOOC: Please, just read the PICI's post on the main page.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 197

no
 

Total Seats: 39

abstain
    

Total Seats: 514


Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

Random quote: "I've been against the death penalty since I was in law school in 1950. It's horrible, discriminatory, and undermines the credibility of the criminal justice system." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70