We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Sports
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party for Equality
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2111
Description[?]:
| It is time that the Likatonian government acknowledged our fine sportspeople, and provided them with the support they need to achieve national acclaim. This will also interest our young people more in sport, providing them with affordable facilities and encouraging fitness among them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The funding of sports clubs.
Old value:: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Current: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Proposed: The government funds some sports clubs side-by-side with private ones.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:02:49, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the National Sports |
| Message | We were thinking or proposing something like this and the CPL will be happy to support this bill. |
| Date | 13:25:24, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the National Sports |
| Message | Thank you for your support. Opinions, anybody else? |
| Date | 13:26:08, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the National Sports |
| Message | I have an opinion! |
| Date | 22:47:56, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the National Sports |
| Message | I never said you didn't :-s |
| Date | 15:51:16, September 12, 2005 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the National Sports |
| Message | Again, we of the RLP must point out that funding leads to control. The private sector has done an excellent job in this area and is not in need of support. We must oppose |
| Date | 17:15:00, September 12, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the National Sports |
| Message | RLP: in such an area, an element of government control cannot be seen as in any way invasive or dangerous, even if that is what the funding leads to. Sport is not going to be politicised just because there is a bit of government input - if we banned private clubs it may be different. This is just a way to raise Likatonia's international sporting profile. |
| Date | 17:15:12, September 12, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the National Sports |
| Message | going to a vote. |
| Date | 22:27:30, September 12, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the National Sports |
| Message | The AAP believes that it's libertarian constituents can be satisifed by the retention of private clubs, while only good can come from the addition of extra 'public' clubs. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 261 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 14 |
| Random fact: Cultural Protocol bills must provide a real-life equivalent or short description for the ethnic groups, languages and religions contained in them, such that it would be easy for an unfamiliar player to understand (e.g. "Dundorfian = German"). Where appropriate, they should also provide guidance to players on where to find help with translations and character names. This might include, for example, links to Google Translate, Behind the Name's Random Name Generator and Fantasy Name Generators. |
| Random quote: "If there's anything a public servant hates to do it's something for the public." - Kin Hubbard |