We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Electrical reform act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvan Socialist Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2542
Description[?]:
| The DSU beleves that Dorviks electrical infrastructure is in need of rivew. Article 2 seeks to aid the running of our nations national grid, due to the nature of electrical infrastructure it would be more safe, efficiant and cost effective if the grid is run bye a single organisation. Article 1 aims to control the prices companies chardge consumers for their elecricity. As electricity as a product does not fit easyly into a free market the DSU recomends that prices be scrutinised by govornment departments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Current: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Proposed: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:58:38, March 04, 2008 CET | From | Mindtakin' Party | To | Debating the Electrical reform act |
| Message | We the Mindtakin' party, find this to be a suitable ladder of proposal. We can find nothing of displeasure in these articals. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 206 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 289 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek |