We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Affairs Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: People Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2541
Description[?]:
A range of proposals featuring amendments to our constitution. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 12
Current: 20
Proposed: 15
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 8
Current: 50
Proposed: 12
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: Ouparath
Current: Prime Minister or पंतप्रधानांची (Pantpradhan)
Proposed: Government Chairperson
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: Maharaja
Current: Rashtrapati ( राष्ट्रपती) sangh ke adhyaksh (President of the Union)
Proposed: Prime Minister
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The appointment of mayors.
Old value:: Mayors are elected by their municipal councils.
Current: Citizens elect their mayor directly in a local election.
Proposed: Citizens elect their mayor directly in a local election.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:54:10, March 03, 2008 CET | From | People Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Affairs Bill |
Message | If you are unsure as to whether you want to back this bill or not, please come and ask me and we can discuss it privately, I hope I can persuade you. Janice Andrews, Head of State |
Date | 00:03:34, March 04, 2008 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Affairs Bill |
Message | I personally don't like the "Head of Government" title you selected but thats just a minor issue and we agree with everything else. |
Date | 00:12:28, March 04, 2008 CET | From | Militarist Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Affairs Bill |
Message | Please remove Articles 3 and 4. The titles of our Heads of Government and State are unique. |
Date | 00:56:49, March 04, 2008 CET | From | Supporters of Science in Design (IP) | To | Debating the Constitutional Affairs Bill |
Message | We see no reason for this to have been rushed through non-voting discussions. We are open to renaming the Ouparath, but the Maharaja has had too much history to be thrown away as a title. -Joseph Hunter, Chancellor Supporters of Science in Design |
Date | 20:04:01, March 04, 2008 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Affairs Bill |
Message | The Maharaja name doesn't have as much history as the name Dauphin. The Dauphin was the first name after the standard "President" name. Personally my party would like to see the Dauphin name return to the head of state. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 465 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 283 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 2 |
Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
Random quote: "Don't listen to what the Communists say, but look at what they do." - Nguyen Van Thieu |