We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Health Care Privatization
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberty Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2542
Description[?]:
| Restore Personal Liberty |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: There is a free public health care system and a small number of private clinics, which are heavily regulated to ensure they treat their patients well and provide good care.
Current: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Proposed: Health care is entirely private.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government supplies free pharmaceutical drugs to those on low incomes.
Current: The government subsidises the cost of pharmaceutical drugs for people on low incomes.
Proposed: The government does not subsidise the cost of pharmaceutical drugs at all.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:01:56, March 05, 2008 CET | From |  Peoples Revolutionary Front | To | Debating the Health Care Privatization |
| Message | bill defeated. |
| Date | 01:04:30, March 06, 2008 CET | From | Cildanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Health Care Privatization |
| Message | Bill not defeated! |
| Date | 02:21:07, March 06, 2008 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Health Care Privatization |
| Message | A facist party supporting us pro liberty =o |
| Date | 05:19:38, March 06, 2008 CET | From | Justice League of Cildania | To | Debating the Health Care Privatization |
| Message | Not surprising, the old social democrats tended to follow where the wind blew as well. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 174 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 134 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "We had no domestic attacks under Bush." - Rudy Giuliani |