We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PSFA Military Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2542
Description[?]:
| A number of bills to make Sekowo less aggresive, that we may be better accepted by the international community. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Proposed: Every public building is required to feature provisions for civil defence and at least 50% of spaces must be allocated to private citizens.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if victory is not feasibile by other means.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government allows conventional arms to be exported freely.
Proposed: The government does not allow arms to be exported.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:02:10, March 05, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the PSFA Military Bill |
| Message | We are against all three. |
| Date | 07:27:30, March 05, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the PSFA Military Bill |
| Message | The CP requires convincing either way. |
| Date | 09:34:47, March 05, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PSFA Military Bill |
| Message | Ooh we hate this bill, because we like the nuclear article, we slightly prefer the arms exportation one, and we hate (loathe!) the building provision article. |
| Date | 11:17:39, March 05, 2008 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the PSFA Military Bill |
| Message | Out of reverence to the NPP, the articles they like will be resubmitted if this bill fails |
| Date | 01:30:52, March 06, 2008 CET | From | Peasant Party Of Sekowo | To | Debating the PSFA Military Bill |
| Message | This will destroy our arms industry putting thousands of workers out of work. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 30 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 387 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 183 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "In all recorded history there has not been one economist who has had to worry about where the next meal would come from." - Peter Drucker |