Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 00:24:37
Server time: 07:35:22, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Crazy Socialism

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Theocrats

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2544

Description[?]:

Lets look after Jakanians for a change.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:38:44, March 10, 2008 CET
FromSocial Theocrats
ToDebating the Crazy Socialism
MessageBeing rich is a sin.

Date18:48:31, March 10, 2008 CET
FromJakanian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Crazy Socialism
MessageBreaking the law of no Omnibus bills should get you arrested...

I shall return!

Date18:53:26, March 10, 2008 CET
FromJakanian Urban Party
ToDebating the Crazy Socialism
Message?

Date19:58:27, March 10, 2008 CET
FromSocial Theocrats
ToDebating the Crazy Socialism
MessageThat law is archaic. No-one pays attention to it anymore.

Date20:06:44, March 10, 2008 CET
FromParty for a Federal Meritocracy
ToDebating the Crazy Socialism
MessageNo one? Have you noticed a trend in our (the FMP's) bills?

Date21:12:23, March 10, 2008 CET
FromSocial Theocrats
ToDebating the Crazy Socialism
MessageThere attempts at killing people as fast as possible?

Date22:35:44, March 10, 2008 CET
FromJakanian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Crazy Socialism
MessageThat bill is still law as long as no one overturns it.


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 60

no
   

Total Seats: 221

abstain
  

Total Seats: 69


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Since when did you care about women?" - Faith Chiang, former Gaduri politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 113