Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 01:40:38
Server time: 22:19:21, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | Autokrator30 | SocDemDundorfian | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2039

Details

Submitted by[?]: Irkan Tomorrow Cabal

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2040

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Datenot recorded
From Progressive Evolution Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2039
MessageAll about it. Any cabinet is better than no cabinet.

Datenot recorded
From Progressive Pragmatists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2039
MessageMy party will vote for this cabinet, grateful to the Presidtent for our inclusion in it. Yet we would like to voice resorvations at having the IRP in charge of defense... We would rather the ITC take charge of that department, as they can be better trusted to go all out in defense of the country...

Datenot recorded
From Progressive Evolution Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2039
MessageIf the IRP is removed from the defense cabinet position we're pulling our support.

Datenot recorded
From Democratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2039
MessageAs a show of good faith, we are willing to support this cabinet,a dn congratulate President Tarkin for finally submitting a new cabinet proposal.

Datenot recorded
From Democratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2039
Message[And yes, I didn't actually read the proposal fully before I made that comment. I wasn't expecting to gain any seats.]

Datenot recorded
From Progressive Pragmatists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2039
MessageSince the DSP has been given seats in the new government it should vote-down that bill it has promoted to weaken the office of Head of State!

Datenot recorded
From Democratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2039
MessageWe would very much enjoy it if the Secular Democrats would deign to give us good reason as to why we should do that?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 210

no
 

Total Seats: 37

abstain
 

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Zardugal. . . very successfully almost managed to implement democracy on a global scale, a millennia ago. With a seat in the Security Council we can do it again." - Phoebe Ĥoniato, former Zardic politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73