Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 01:10:48
Server time: 18:49:11, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | Paulo Nogueira | R Drax | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547

Details

Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2548

Description[?]:

Sekowo needs to take the final steps of deregulating religion where it is not harmful and restore freedom to the schools of Sekowo.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:21:59, March 18, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageWe cannot stand for either of these articles. We are content to let you have it the way it is now, but further steps will greatly try our patience.

In addition, deregulating these things is harmful. Do you realize that without these regualtions these schools don't have to teach anything academic at all.

Date16:24:00, March 18, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageNo.
These are threats to the Secular nature of our country and society.

Date16:57:36, March 18, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageThe CP supports.

Date20:05:24, March 18, 2008 CET
FromIndependence Coalition
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageWe support.

Date00:17:47, March 19, 2008 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageThese are measures to ensure a secular nation by having no government involvement in religious affairs, we support.

Date03:29:36, March 19, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageThis will, however, make it possible for religion to influence the government, witch is also a no no.

Date04:11:06, March 19, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageReligion already influences the government, whether we acknowledge that or not. Just as philosophy influences the government, psychology, sociology, etc.

Date00:27:31, March 20, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageWe should do our best to limit it though.

Date10:42:32, March 20, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Sekowo Religious Freedom Bill 2547
MessageIf you limit it under one name, it will come back under another, disguised as politics, humanism, or forward thinking. Best to keep things open and free.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 146

no
    

Total Seats: 230

abstain
  

Total Seats: 224


Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account.

Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80