We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Local regulations of the industrial use of Cannabis Sativa
Details
Submitted by[?]: Aliojin Party SC
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2111
Description[?]:
As we see there is no legislation about industrial hemp, so we put into consideration to left the regulation of industrial hemp to the local goverments. This is also a way to put in motion local democracies |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning industrial hemp.
Old value:: There are no regulations on industrial hemp.
Current: Only regulated agribusinesses may produce industrial hemp.
Proposed: Industrial hemp regulations are left up to local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:24:53, September 13, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist of Al'Badara SC | To | Debating the Local regulations of the industrial use of Cannabis Sativa |
Message | We feel Industrial Hemp is an useful substance and should there fore not be regulated by states. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 750 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "When there's a single thief, it's robbery. When there are a thousand thieves, it's taxation. " -Vanya Cohen |