We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forest Protection Compromise Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriot Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2550
Description[?]:
Nor do we care! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Proposed: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:32:10, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Tuatha Dé Danann | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | Support wholeheartedly. |
Date | 19:15:48, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | support as well |
Date | 19:42:04, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | We also support. |
Date | 23:11:12, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | We oppose. |
Date | 23:26:20, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | And why are you obecting JUP! |
Date | 23:30:09, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | Forests belong to local governments and they are in the best place to regulate them, which is why we voted for the current scheme of devolution, and against its removable. Because these two proposals are in the same act, we have no option but to oppose them both. The forest management change might be acceptable, it's hard to say. |
Date | 23:45:20, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | So basically you object to Article 1. |
Date | 23:46:19, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | We definitely object to the change in the forest protection laws. |
Date | 00:02:12, March 21, 2008 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | That's because you do not love the forest. |
Date | 00:15:36, March 21, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | The people of Boruska "love the Boruska forest" much more than bureaucrats in Sangon "love the Boruska forest". |
Date | 00:19:04, March 21, 2008 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | That I can say is false. We the people of Tukarali love the forests of Tukarali. |
Date | 00:29:39, March 21, 2008 CET | From | Tuatha Dé Danann | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | Touché |
Date | 00:31:15, March 21, 2008 CET | From | Tuatha Dé Danann | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | Touché |
Date | 00:42:37, March 21, 2008 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Forest Protection Compromise Act |
Message | *curtsies* |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 213 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 112 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 145 |
Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
Random quote: "It would be nice if the poor were to get even half of the money that is spent in studying them." - Bill Vaughan |