Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5472
Next month in: 02:11:43
Server time: 17:48:16, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Autokrator30 | hyraemous | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security

Details

Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2111

Description[?]:

In the interests of freedom, national security, and greatest number of options, the Anarch Anakrousite Party recommends that the Likatonian government look at our chemical weapon policy, with a view to revision.

Let us state - the AAP does not WANT to use chemical weapons, and does not ENDORSE use of chemical weapons. In fact, the AAP fervently hopes that Likatonia NEVER uses chemical weapons.

However, at the moment we MAY use chemical weapons, but only if some other nation strikes first - by which time, of course, it is too late to do anything CONSTRUCTIVE.

The AAP believes our chemical weapons will be more of a deterrent, IF we allow ourselves a "First Strike" option. Not that we ever WANT to use it.... just so it is there.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:35:29, September 13, 2005 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security
MessageWe feel that we should not give ourselves the option of first strike, as this will put us into disrepute amongst the inetrnational community. Its far better to retain the right to retaliate, rather than place ourselves on the militarist extreme.

Date15:39:03, September 13, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security
MessageWe feel the same (except that we would actually like to ban these things). See comments on National security ii, the same applies.

Date15:46:14, September 13, 2005 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security
MessageAh, we believe that stocks should be kept, for research, amongst other things.

Date16:47:09, September 13, 2005 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security
MessageWhile we of the RLP do not like restricting our foreign policy, for reasons of international appearences we feel that the current policy is sufficient.

Date22:34:27, September 13, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - National Security
MessageThe AAP would like to thank the erstwhile members of our brother/sister parties, for their contributions and consideration.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 79

no
     

Total Seats: 168

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation.

Random quote: "He comes out of hibernation once every three years and says something stupid. No wonder the UR fell apart." - Tirza Sommer, Pragmatic Party Leader, on the Dorvish President, Leonhard Khan.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61