Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 02:02:53
Server time: 17:57:06, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): burgerboys | DanivonX | Dx6743 | Nileowen_Kir | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Progressive Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2111

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet with the parties the L-PU votes at least 70% of the time with.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:06:55, September 13, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageAny thoughts

Date18:07:12, September 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageWe can accept this. Hopefully this should prevent the cabinet wars of the last paliament session.

Date18:10:00, September 13, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageGood, put it to vote?

Date18:34:25, September 13, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageWSS!P why the no vote, you have 2 positions?

Date19:51:11, September 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageI doubt that the USM will accept this only one seat. I'll create a WSS/LPU/UB cabinet and see if they accept it.

Date20:01:50, September 13, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageOk, Should we vote no on this or abstain?

Date20:07:08, September 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageI'll change to no as I don't like seeing abstain on my voting record. I don't think (hope) this won't affect the population's views on us.

Date20:10:07, September 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageIt's going to look funny though with all the members of a cabinet voting against it :-)

Date20:13:16, September 13, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageVoting no on my own proposal is a pretty rare thing to do.

Date20:15:09, September 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageJust for fun I've changed my vote to "Hello Wouter!" (by editing the address bar). Any ideas what will happen?

Date20:18:05, September 13, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageI was confused as to your disapperance from the voting. Phantom vote.. Thats funny stuff.

Date20:20:17, September 13, 2005 CET
FromLeft Communist Party
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageWe feel that this cabinet is unacceptable, as the United Blobs party would have a monopoly...

Date20:22:33, September 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageYou know a monopoly would mean my having all 10 posts? With this cabinet (now superseeded by a new one) I would not even have a majority. I believe you have had similar amounts of power in the past so...

Date20:38:47, September 13, 2005 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
Message@L-PU - Would you believe I'm rather tired, and was just heading out the door (I checked Particracy just to see how the election went) and didn't notice I was in the cabinet...oops.

Date21:09:15, September 13, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
MessageThats ok, two posistions in my cabinet proposal wasn't that good anyway.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
            

    Total Seats: 374

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 26


    Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "Hunger is not the worst feature of unemployment; idleness is." - William E. Barrett

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66