We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Progressive Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2111
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet with the parties the L-PU votes at least 70% of the time with. |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Hobratsis Respublikis Prezidenti (President of the Hobrazian Republic) chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Liberal-Progressive Union
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal-Progressive Union
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Liberal-Progressive Union
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the United Blobs
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:06:55, September 13, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | Any thoughts |
Date | 18:07:12, September 13, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | We can accept this. Hopefully this should prevent the cabinet wars of the last paliament session. |
Date | 18:10:00, September 13, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | Good, put it to vote? |
Date | 18:34:25, September 13, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | WSS!P why the no vote, you have 2 positions? |
Date | 19:51:11, September 13, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | I doubt that the USM will accept this only one seat. I'll create a WSS/LPU/UB cabinet and see if they accept it. |
Date | 20:01:50, September 13, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | Ok, Should we vote no on this or abstain? |
Date | 20:07:08, September 13, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | I'll change to no as I don't like seeing abstain on my voting record. I don't think (hope) this won't affect the population's views on us. |
Date | 20:10:07, September 13, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | It's going to look funny though with all the members of a cabinet voting against it :-) |
Date | 20:13:16, September 13, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | Voting no on my own proposal is a pretty rare thing to do. |
Date | 20:15:09, September 13, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | Just for fun I've changed my vote to "Hello Wouter!" (by editing the address bar). Any ideas what will happen? |
Date | 20:18:05, September 13, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | I was confused as to your disapperance from the voting. Phantom vote.. Thats funny stuff. |
Date | 20:20:17, September 13, 2005 CET | From | Left Communist Party | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | We feel that this cabinet is unacceptable, as the United Blobs party would have a monopoly... |
Date | 20:22:33, September 13, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | You know a monopoly would mean my having all 10 posts? With this cabinet (now superseeded by a new one) I would not even have a majority. I believe you have had similar amounts of power in the past so... |
Date | 20:38:47, September 13, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | @L-PU - Would you believe I'm rather tired, and was just heading out the door (I checked Particracy just to see how the election went) and didn't notice I was in the cabinet...oops. |
Date | 21:09:15, September 13, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Cabinet Proposal of May 2110 |
Message | Thats ok, two posistions in my cabinet proposal wasn't that good anyway. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||||
no |
Total Seats: 374 | ||||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 26 |
Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "Hunger is not the worst feature of unemployment; idleness is." - William E. Barrett |