We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: TJU - Harmonisation of banner
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judiciary Patriciate Coalition
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2552
Description[?]:
Replacing the contrasting white, red and green of the original banner with white, red and blue, also joining the curves with the star to give a more unified concept |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The national flag (URL).
Old value:: http://img334.imageshack.us/img334/6149/kafuristanh21sa.gif
Current: https://i.postimg.cc/yd1T4KL8/Flag-of-Kafuristan.png
Proposed: http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/8500/kafuribannertn8.jpg
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:19:05, March 23, 2008 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | No. |
Date | 23:33:24, March 23, 2008 CET | From | Judiciary Patriciate Coalition | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | Care to embellish that? I am open to modifications to fit general consensus. |
Date | 23:37:00, March 23, 2008 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | I want to keep what we have. No modifications at all. |
Date | 01:28:34, March 24, 2008 CET | From | Judiciary Patriciate Coalition | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | Why? It's ugly, fractured and clashing |
Date | 01:33:55, March 24, 2008 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | I disagree. |
Date | 11:26:55, March 24, 2008 CET | From | Judiciary Patriciate Coalition | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | That's irrelevant. I am dealing with objective parts here: Clashing: Red clashes with green, no matter who you are Fragmented: The star is separated from the rest, thus fragmented Ugly: The two above cause this Personal opinion on what is ugly is of little importance, it does clash and it is fragmented, my proposed banner is neither of these. |
Date | 11:31:24, March 24, 2008 CET | From | Judiciary Patriciate Coalition | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | (Image updated) |
Date | 01:44:05, March 27, 2008 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | Red and green work for Italy. Hungary. Transdniestria. Morocco. Bulgaria. Saudi Arabia and many other Arabic nations (along with white and black). What you call "fractured" by the separated star is in fact perfectly balanced. Here are some almost miraculous statistics for our existing flag: - Distance between the star's right-side points and the nearest white chevron is exactly the same distance as the right side of the flag to the opposite side of the other white chevron (at the same height). - The width of the thickest part of the red chevron is also identical to the distance from the star's left point to the hoist of the flag. This is the same distance between the white chevron's point to the inner corner of the star. - These white chevrons are identical, and each exactly 1/2 the width of the red chevron. - The red chevron's thickest part is exactly 1/2 the width of the green field's thinnest part. - The green field's widest part is 7/2 times as wide as its thinnest part. - The red star's white outline is one half the width of the white chevrons. - The black section's widest segments, at the top and bottom, are 11/15 the flag's width. - Each chevron is formed by the filling of two tangent circles (each with a diameter of the flag's height) and a shifted cutaway of the same shape. - Red star's total height is exactly 1/2 flag's height Here is an example of several of the proportions. http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/1157/clipboard02sz1.gif Furthermore, a direct comparison between the existing flag and this proposal, toggling back and forth between tabs, yields a major preference in the eyes of the majority for the current flag. |
Date | 05:29:28, March 27, 2008 CET | From | Royalist Party of Islam | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | It's an excellent effort, but in the end I'm going to have to stick with tradition. |
Date | 06:09:59, March 27, 2008 CET | From | National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the TJU - Harmonisation of banner |
Message | Go Flagmaker's Local 2496! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 682 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 33 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: "A society that has more justice is a society that needs less charity." - Ralph Nader |