Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 01:32:56
Server time: 02:27:03, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Temporary PFP Site Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2551

Description[?]:

Relocates the capital for additional security.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:01:55, March 23, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Temporary PFP Site Act
Messagewe need to defend ourselves NOW.

Date00:46:55, March 24, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Temporary PFP Site Act
MessageWe counter attacked and all of eastern Rapula and is now just 17km east of Zaphograd, so the capital is safe. We will launch another offesiv aimed at retaking the rest of Rapula within the next few days

Date00:58:00, March 24, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Temporary PFP Site Act
Messagehey, you read my article - maybe. I feel moving the capital may still be wise - whether we want to formally move it or just move government leaders there while Port Andalay remains the capital on paper.

Date01:06:09, March 24, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Temporary PFP Site Act
Messageas long as the enemy is loosing ground in Rapula I dont really see the need for it. maybe if the war turnes around yet again. Moving the government leaders out of the capital would be a wise move since with the enemy we are facing this war might turn nuclear sometime in the future

Date01:09:24, March 24, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Temporary PFP Site Act
MessageI think then we agree that moving senior leaders out of the capital would be wise. Perhaps moving the capital would rattle confidence.

Date01:17:44, March 24, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Temporary PFP Site Act
Messagelet's keep this bill alive just in case. If the enemy does not advance, then we can kill this bill, but if they launch another attack, we are going to need this bill.

Date04:13:22, March 24, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Temporary PFP Site Act
Messagejust repropse it and keep it in debate status until its needed.
I would support a bill to remove the members of cabinet to some unknown location away from the capital until this conflict is resolved

Date06:23:32, March 24, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Temporary PFP Site Act
MessageI don't think we need a bill for that, simply for GGP to approve.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 30

no
    

Total Seats: 66

abstain
   

Total Seats: 54


Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

Random quote: "It would be nice if the poor were to get even half of the money that is spent in studying them." - Bill Vaughan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59