Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5471
Next month in: 01:21:19
Server time: 02:38:40, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: RadNat Agenda 2550-2551

Details

Submitted by[?]: Meritocratic Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2551

Description[?]:

Some changes we'd like to see occur.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:30:07, March 24, 2008 CET
FromSolentian Populist Party
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageRespectfully,

The United Democratic Party is willing to lend our support to Articles 1, 9, and 13, and we are flirting with the idea of Article 15.

The rest, however, are far too radical for us to accept.

Drop Articles 1, 9, 13, and 15 into a separate bill and we will support those.

Signed,
President Hillary Rodham

Date17:38:26, March 24, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageNo.

Date18:45:24, March 24, 2008 CET
FromSolentian Populist Party
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageVery well. I admire your determination. We will abstain for now, and see how the other parties vote. If you won't separate Articles 1, 9, 13, and 15, then I cannot at this time vote no, as I strongly support those articles.

I genuinely would like to see those four articles passed, and it if means accepting some other legislation that I don't necessarily agree with, well, then I will not rule that out as a possibility.

Your short response concerns me, and I truly hope I have not offended. I am doing my best to work with all parties to see past differences and get the job done.

Sincerely,
Hillary Rodham

Date19:19:33, March 24, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageNo we are just totally plagued by a lack of time. These items may come up for vote again as seperate issues.

SRNP.

Date19:35:58, March 24, 2008 CET
FromSolentian Populist Party
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageNone among us can fault you for the lack of time. It seems sometimes that no matter how long or hard we work to resolve these issues, the paperwork just continues to pile up.

I will continue to abstain from voting on this issue for the time being, as I do agree with many of your policies. I am simply torn between the demands of my less-radical constituents and my personal ideals.

Hillary Rodham

Date01:39:04, March 25, 2008 CET
FromFederal Republican Party
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageOOC:

Article Two is currently about to or has passed; just as a note. The F.R.P. is considering this bill in the meantime.

Date02:32:42, March 25, 2008 CET
FromAutonomist Party of Solentia
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageAt the expense of being informal and rude the Founders of the Autocratic Nationalist Front find the contents of this bill to be not only misleading but insulting. To expect our people to agree to any form of slavery is a joke.

Compulsory schooling without the right to home schooling would be a direct insult to our religious citizens.

This bill seems adamant on removing the power of our local governments and instilling an overpowered, and condescending federal government.

Date03:35:22, March 25, 2008 CET
FromSolentian Populist Party
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageThe United Democratic Party is extremely torn on this issue, and until further insight is reached, we cannot yet reach a decision. We apologize for holding up the process and keeping the Solentian Radical Nationalist Party in suspense.


Date15:38:23, March 25, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageTo the AFN:

We respect your opinions. We feel, however, that during the horrible years of the Conservative Morality Party, far too much control was removed from the central government and placed on already overburdened local governments. This bill seeks to redress many of those issues.

Date15:49:23, March 25, 2008 CET
FromAutonomist Party of Solentia
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageI can understand your concerns on many of these articles, but if you could please explain why you have included that slavery, even that of convicted criminals, is ok?

Date20:07:10, March 25, 2008 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the RadNat Agenda 2550-2551
MessageWe believe that it IS ok. Should the guilty be given vacations for their crimes? We think not.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 136

no
      

Total Seats: 289

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

    Random quote: "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them." - Bill Vaughn

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 131