Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5475
Next month in: 00:40:03
Server time: 23:19:56, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Right To Security Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Anti-Communist Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2552

Description[?]:

Malivians have a right to security and stability. The changes made by the communists will only bring instability and inefficiently All people have a right to basic freedoms, but these freedoms should never threaten security or stability of the Malivian people or nation.

Under current laws the people whom protect our freedoms, or security, are restricted by the needless laws currently in place. Current laws prevent our Police doing their duty in an efficient manner. Justice must come swiftly and completely for order and security to prosper.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:57:42, March 25, 2008 CET
FromMilitarist Party
ToDebating the Right To Security Act
MessageThe MP is in full support of this bill

Date15:14:54, March 25, 2008 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Right To Security Act
MessageWe are unsure of Article 1 but we can support Article 2.

Date15:31:22, March 25, 2008 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the Right To Security Act
MessageArticle two would only be used against enemies of the state who hold vital information.Malivia's own citizens would never be subjected to torture.

Date00:44:43, March 26, 2008 CET
FromNew Conservative Party of Malivia
ToDebating the Right To Security Act
MessageWe support this bill.

Date02:10:19, March 26, 2008 CET
FromSoviet Party (Trotskyist)
ToDebating the Right To Security Act
MessageWe oppose this bill. Torture is a violation of basic human rights, and allowing police to have lethal weapons is a license for them to go on a killing spree. I quote Benjamin Franklin:
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Date02:55:48, March 26, 2008 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the Right To Security Act
MessageOOC: One of my faverite quotes.
IC: Equiping our police with weapons Malivians can acquire themselves is not a license to go on a killing spree. Our police are the enforcers of law and they should have the tools needed to properly enforce it. The people whom would be tortured would already be people who have already violated human rights countless times.

Date15:12:59, March 26, 2008 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the Right To Security Act
MessageDoes everyone else support this bill?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 326

no
 

Total Seats: 174

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

    Random quote: "Because democracy is not a spectator sport." - 2004 Democratic campaign slogan

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 73