Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 03:56:51
Server time: 16:03:08, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): burgerboys | hyraemous | Lab47AU | lulus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Healthcare Reform Act of 2551

Details

Submitted by[?]: Solentian Populist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2552

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:48:49, March 26, 2008 CET
FromFederal Republican Party
ToDebating the Healthcare Reform Act of 2551
MessageOriginally announced and delivered in the Healthcare Reform Act of 2550 with pertinent amendments..


"Respectfully,

To our respected colleagues perhaps clarification is in order. To the esteemed N.Z.P and U.D.P; it is not a right of Solentians to have healthcare provided to them. It simply is not. If you can explain to me the logic behind having everyone pay for people who have income levels above one-hundred thousand a year, of whom can afford their own private insurance or is likely provided at their workplace. Article two does not abolish a national healthcare system. It makes it more sensible, if anything. It allows us to clear an enormous burden on all Solentians paying for everyones healthcare while focusing this wealth in other areas and having a surplus to cover those unemployed or otherwise living on low-incomes.

Article 1 runs deep to the heart of our founding principals. It is not the governments job to dictate morality upon our citizens. You may have no seen it yet but, within the papers this morning it was announced a fellow legislator was implicated in a bribery scandal. We must have credibility in the government and we do not. Who are we to dictate such principals upon children. It is the parents job, not the governments.

We can understand your concerns about Article 1's language, as it does cause alarm with some of our own senior party members. However, the F.R.P. has studied this thoroughly and found that such a regulation on the sale to minors of tobacco will in aggregate do our nation a favor. Minors who are going to smoke, are going to smoke with or without a law-we all know this. It is also known that smoking is a plague upon our health and is costing our nations countless amounts of money on healthcare of smoking-related illness. At best this measure serves as a deterent and a friendly way to induce parents to explain the consequences of picking up such an atrocious habit. Also, in full disclosure I, Ulrich Naveed, am a smoker and am in support of this measure.

Respectfully,
Signed,
Party Chairman, Ulrich Naveed"

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 196

no
     

Total Seats: 229

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

    Random quote: "I realize that a life predicated on being obedient and taking orders is a very comfortable life indeed. Living in such a way reduces to a minimum one's need to think." - Adolf Eichmann

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 47