We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Drug Liberalization Bill (2552)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2552
Description[?]:
The people of Sekowo demand a free market in drug research. We hereby offer them one. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The research and development of pharmaceutical drugs.
Old value:: The government subsidizes research and development of prescription drugs and regulates their prices.
Current: The government subsidizes research and development of prescription drugs and regulates their prices.
Proposed: The government neither subsidizes research and development of drugs nor regulates their prices.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:48:41, March 27, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Drug Liberalization Bill (2552) |
Message | Refers to the poll: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewnews.php?newsid=153837 Subsidizes Research = 50.41% (CP favours) *No Subsidizes Research = 49.59% Regulate Prices = 30.88% *Not Regulate Prices = 69.12% (CP favours) Can a pro-party explain how not subsidizing research would stimulate growth and research in this industry? Science funding has shown in the past to benefit GDP growth. Voting in favour of this bill could potentially slow down our economy. Granted, not regulating prices could increase our GDP too. But where is the equilibrium point? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 287 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 211 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 102 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "War crimes is such a lilliputian term for the atrocities committed by the Yeudish state." - Katrine Lorenzen, former Kazulian diplomat |