Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 02:33:30
Server time: 05:26:29, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Massive Proposal Elimination Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2554

Description[?]:

The LLP has been proposing many laws which will never pass. as a result, their visibilty increases. This practice should end.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:10:15, March 28, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Massive Proposal Elimination Act
MessageIs there any reason why you would propose such thing? There is no need for this, there are other things more important that you can propose for a change.

Date21:37:51, March 28, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Massive Proposal Elimination Act
MessageYeah there is no need for such a thing. Also it is not just the party who propose the bill who get more visability, everyone gets it.
And this would make it harder for new parties to set there political positions

Date00:06:47, March 29, 2008 CET
FromPariah Idealism
ToDebating the Massive Proposal Elimination Act
MessageChange article 1 to 4 and you have a deal! You should post well thought out and important issues not just for visibility. Don't you think we got enough stupidity in this world?

Date02:25:02, March 29, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Massive Proposal Elimination Act
MessageYou call my bills stupidity just because you dont agree on them? Those positions are what my party stand for, and its what we think is best for our country

Date04:26:16, March 29, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Massive Proposal Elimination Act
MessageI oppose lumping 10 articles into a single bill. If LLP is willing to stop that, I'd alter this bill somewhat. Possibly limiting the max accumulated to 9 and leaving the other value unchanged.

Date15:20:10, March 29, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Massive Proposal Elimination Act
MessageWell if URP is so against it they dident have to do the same thing. But anyway its not like I do this thing all the time, and I dont really see the problem with having one bill with alot of articles at once, the other parties can just vote against it if the oppose the bill.

Date11:31:44, March 30, 2008 CET
From Gil's Green party
ToDebating the Massive Proposal Elimination Act
MessageI can agree with limiting the accumulation to 6 or 9,

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 7

no
       

Total Seats: 143

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game.

Random quote: "A dictatorship is a country where they have taken the politics out of politics." - Sam Himmell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67