Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 00:43:31
Server time: 19:16:28, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): DanivonX | JWDL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: LSD Constitutional Amendment #2

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2555

Description[?]:

We believe that a longer election term will allow the Parliament more time to pass bills, and allow parties to gain more visibility.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:26:16, March 31, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Capitalist Delegation
ToDebating the LSD Constitutional Amendment #2
MessageThe popular sovreignty which this country was built on will be compromised by increasing the terms of parlimentary representatives. The DCD cannot support this proposed constitutional amendment despite our good relationship with the LSD party.

James Lott
Chairman
Democratic Capitalist Delegation

Date05:50:30, April 01, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Capitalist Delegation
ToDebating the LSD Constitutional Amendment #2
MessageAfter a private conference with Chairman Matthew Hogan of the LSD party, the DCD is changing its official stance on this bill. We believe that representatives to parliament will be able to dedicate more energy to bettering and advancing the Republic of Telamon with a 4 year term, as re-election will not be an issue of constant concern. We have assessed that a liberty threatening loss of popular authority will not be suffered by a lengthened term.

James Lott
Chairman
Democratic Capitalist Delegation

Date07:29:23, April 01, 2008 CET
FromConservative Ordo Malleus (COM)
ToDebating the LSD Constitutional Amendment #2
MessageParliamentarians shouldn't be constantly engaged in campaigning. However, elections force the important business at hand to be concluded prior to the cessation of a term. If terms are lengthened, too much, how can Parliament ever expect to handle the necessary business of the day?
-Roger Evars, COM Party Leader

Date07:53:22, April 01, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the LSD Constitutional Amendment #2
MessageThe Republican Party believes that 4 years is to long for parliament to really get the important work done. That why the term length should be 2 to 3 years long. The RP would support an increase to 3 years terms.

Date10:06:04, April 01, 2008 CET
FromRightful Radical Party
ToDebating the LSD Constitutional Amendment #2
MessageThe Rightful Radical Party won't support any bill that will change the length of a legislative and executive term. We think it is good as it already is.
- Vojislav Krkljus, Head of RRP

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 250

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

Random quote: "The worst thing the bad guys can do is force us to doubt the good ones." - Viria Agelasta, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58