Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 01:57:25
Server time: 14:02:34, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: United Cabinet

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2555

Description[?]:

According to Beluzia defence party kick me out, so i also kick him out here
and i bring all other parties except beluzia defence party. it is time to unite

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:24:54, April 02, 2008 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageYou voted against a cabinet that included you... are you kidding?

Date20:25:38, April 02, 2008 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
Messagehold on, didn’t see who made the proposal....

I kicked out the 2 parties that voted with me 30% of the time. Check the voting stats

Date20:32:50, April 02, 2008 CET
FromUnited Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy
ToDebating the United Cabinet
Messagehuh...but i dont see any of my name there lol
so i make this proposal...erm i check again

Date20:37:11, April 02, 2008 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageI read the description and thought it was the PPP.

Its not personal, we vote together 21% of the time, which means your party is my direct opposition. Besides, anything with over 50% of the legislature is overkill anyway.

Date20:43:21, April 02, 2008 CET
FromUnited Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy
ToDebating the United Cabinet
Messagewhat you mean " I read the description and thought it was the PPP"
ya ur party is capitalist, my party is socialist, sure opposition haha

Date20:59:55, April 02, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageMines in between... we are largly laizzes faire for the purpose of a strong economy, but we have much in common with ZSRA.

Date21:02:46, April 02, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the United Cabinet
Messagewe should make a coalition w the Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party, but not on their terms alone...

Date21:35:13, April 02, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageI suggest that the terms of coalition are : a fair number of seats for all members of the coalition, negotiation on monachy, etc.

Date22:30:38, April 02, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageAnyone who agrees to support Restoration of Zog as monarch can be included in any PPP cabinet. Everything else is negotiable. There is a great deal of flexibility regarding these other matters, but we shan't be railroaded either... some compromise can and will occur.

Date00:12:57, April 03, 2008 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageAnyone who willingly supports the institution of giving any one party totalitarian control of the government is foolish, as is this proposal. That is exactly what a monarchy is: totalitarian control.

You may be able to pass a government that excludes me, but you will NEVER have enough seats to be able to re-establish the monarchy, as long as me, Tax and Spend and the NMRP exist. And I ask anyone in the Zog coalition this, why would you ever settle for “Food and Agriculture” when you could be head of state? Its not You will simply never have 2/3 of the votes.

So rather then focus on a pipe dream, I instead focus on create a cabinet of parties that are similar to mine, and vote similar to me, but yet somehow that means that I should not be included in a "united cabinet"? In the last election, 1 out of every 4 Beluzians voted for me. I won the presidential election by almost 10% and 20 million votes. And yet when I fail to include a party that banned cars and mandates killing the old and sick, somehow I am worthy of being excluded from the cabinet. When I don’t attack our neighbors, I deserve a vote of no confidence, despite the fact that as the Defense Minister and the Commander in Chief of the Beluzian Armed Forces I was not even consulted first?


That’s not what my party stands for now, will it ever be what my party stands for. You may have a cabinet coalition, but the PPP and BNP vote with the ZSRA 40% of the time and with me around 60% of the time. My legislation will still get passed, and this country will still be a free, better place as long as I am on watch.

If it comes down to it, someday, much sooner then the day that you have 2/3 of the legislature, I will have a coalition of 50% of the liberals and will be back in the cabinet. Just remember that you may win now, but I will win later.

Date01:20:18, April 03, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageMonarchy is not totalitarian, the constution bars it.

Date16:11:04, April 03, 2008 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageMonarchy prevents the people from electing a head of state and rather gives them one we so choose…

Date16:14:50, April 03, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageWell not exactly, the people have to elect that person in the first place. With our current Referendum the people are fully aware that if they elect Zog they are voting in favour of monarchy.

Date16:59:40, April 03, 2008 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageSo if the people really want Zog to rule the country then there is no reason a monarchy is necessary. I have much less of a problem with Zog running the country, than with the fact that is there would be no check on his power if he were monarch.

Date17:02:36, April 03, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the United Cabinet
MessageA constitutional monarch doesnt have the power of the High Chancellor, or a President. Power is usually exercised through the Cabinet Ministers.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 505

no
 

Total Seats: 181

abstain
 

Total Seats: 64


Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

Random quote: "Taxes, after all, are dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 81