We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: COM Environmental Reform Act 1
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Ordo Malleus (COM)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2556
Description[?]:
Telamon's environment must be dealt with properly. Parliament must enact legislation to appropriately handle and maintain our natural resources while balancing the needs of society and our people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:59:52, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Capitalist Delegation | To | Debating the COM Environmental Reform Act 1 |
Message | The DCD has serious concerns with this piece of legislation, as we worry that it may generate a dependence on foreign paper. We believe that one stand both the COM party and the DCD can agree on is the necessity of avoiding dependency on foreign goods. We believe that Article I may compromise this avoidance. James Lott Chairman Democratic Capitalist Delegation |
Date | 15:40:44, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Capitalist Delegation | To | Debating the COM Environmental Reform Act 1 |
Message | Correction: The Article concerning forest protection is the one which concerns us. |
Date | 17:01:11, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the COM Environmental Reform Act 1 |
Message | We applaud these articles proposed by the COM. We will fully support this piece of legislation. |
Date | 17:56:37, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Rightful Radical Party | To | Debating the COM Environmental Reform Act 1 |
Message | The Rightful Radical Party will vote against this bill. - Vojislav Krkljus, Head of RRP |
Date | 18:52:44, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Capitalist Delegation | To | Debating the COM Environmental Reform Act 1 |
Message | The overall ecological benefits of this bill will garner the endorsement of the DCD, but we strongly urge the COM party to reconsider the strict regulation concerning forestry. James Lott Chairman Democratic Capitalist Delegation |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 228 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 172 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "Economic advance is not the same thing as human progress." - John Clapham |