We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: A change
Details
Submitted by[?]: Marxist-Separatist Front Of Meria
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2556
Description[?]:
... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The method used to determine the number of seats each region receives in the national legislature.
Old value:: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Current: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Proposed: Equal representation, regardless of region population.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:49:21, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Democratic National Party | To | Debating the A change |
Message | How many more times are you two going to propose this? Can't you see that there is no support for it? |
Date | 19:26:58, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Marxist-Separatist Front Of Meria | To | Debating the A change |
Message | I am sorry, but I want that the likatonians could live in a democracy, |
Date | 21:28:15, April 03, 2008 CET | From | General Confederation of Labour | To | Debating the A change |
Message | Do we ask you why are you liberal? No, then shut up! You don't know what are people's rights you only know the corporations' rights. |
Date | 22:27:51, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the A change |
Message | Calm down there, kids. Telling the other parties to shut up is abusive and unnessecary, whereas, when a Bill that requires 66% of the vote has, repeatedly, been shot down by the other parties, why keep proposing it and throwing it to vote, wasting everyones time. If you are serious about this, stop having your commie love-in, and come to the table and negotiate. |
Date | 22:58:17, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Democratic National Party | To | Debating the A change |
Message | "You don't know what are people's rights you only know the corporations' rights." -There is no liberty unless there is economic liberty. |
Date | 23:09:40, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the A change |
Message | Sorry, CLP - but that's utter rubbish. A societal model that had no currency, no monetary system, no real system of exchange... supplied purely according to needs, provided purely according to capacity and ability - could still have a great deal of freedom in terms of religious, social, political liberty. The whole "no liberty unless there is economic liberty" is a crock - it's how certain militant libertarians WISH it were, but - fortunately - it bears absolutely no relation to reality. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 168 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 498 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it." - Clarence Darrow |