We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Parti Imperial du Peuple (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2557
Description[?]:
So what do you guys think of the current treaty proposal. Any likes, dislikes, or middle ground areas that you believe we need to disscuse? http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=963 |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:38:13, April 04, 2008 CET | From | House Villayn (AI) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | It looks good. We will support this. |
Date | 00:51:17, April 04, 2008 CET | From | Parti Imperial du Peuple (IA) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | The problem is dealing with all these other nations. Some love it. Some are half and half.Some hate it but are at least polite about it, and some are just plain rude about it. |
Date | 04:06:34, April 04, 2008 CET | From | Saiserist Consortium | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | We like it. We don't see why other nations are so stubborn about this union that would only make them stronger. |
Date | 04:10:54, April 04, 2008 CET | From | Parti Imperial du Peuple (IA) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | Trust me some believe it will take power away from them for some reason and they get very annoyed when told otherwise. I have even gone as to added that nations can uses their own currency, but they have to recognise the SD as a currency. |
Date | 04:16:36, April 04, 2008 CET | From | Parti Imperial du Peuple (IA) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | This Union might be the end of poor old Victor, he is try so hard and yet there are still those who instist that this is a treaty to form one giant nation. |
Date | 15:44:44, April 06, 2008 CET | From | Parti Imperial du Peuple (IA) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | I want to see who would vote where on the current treaty. It would look bad if its creator is not in it. |
Date | 16:21:13, April 06, 2008 CET | From | House Villayn (AI) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | Which Nations are interested? |
Date | 18:51:25, April 06, 2008 CET | From | Parti Imperial du Peuple (IA) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | Counting us, I think there will be a total of 5 when formed, more later. The EU and UN started with a few and grew. This one will do the same. NBM did you even read the new treaty or did you just vote no? |
Date | 19:21:50, April 06, 2008 CET | From | House Villayn (AI) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | I asked which nations are interested, not how many. Are Mordusia or Rildanor interested? |
Date | 22:05:39, April 06, 2008 CET | From | Parti Imperial du Peuple (IA) | To | Debating the Current Seleyan Union Treaty proposal |
Message | Rildanor is, but Mordusia is not it seems. They think it takes away to much nation power. Also I changed some parts of it tat other nations were having trouble with, so take a look at it if you have not already done so. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 506 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 244 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
Random quote: "Political correctness is just tyranny with manners." - Charlton Heston |