We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Elimination of Government Energy Subsidies
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberty Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2112
Description[?]:
Market forces are sufficient to encourage energy companies to research & develop renewable energy sources (as non-renewable sources decline, the price of the energy necessarily increases, making renewable competitive). In terms of pollution implications, existing pollution control legislation is entirely sufficient. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Renewable energy sources (eg. solar power, wind power).
Old value:: Government subsidies are provided for research and generation of energy through renewable sources.
Current: Government subsidies are provided for research and generation of energy through renewable sources.
Proposed: The government does not take any position with regards to renewable energy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:29:26, September 15, 2005 CET | From | Capitalist Party | To | Debating the The Elimination of Government Energy Subsidies |
Message | Fully support |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 139 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 254 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 162 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods." - John Maynard Keynes |