We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2564
Description[?]:
URP Reform Act |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Food and beverage labeling regulations.
Old value:: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Current: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Proposed: There are no laws concerning food and beverage labeling.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Food safety policy.
Old value:: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Current: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Proposed: There are no food standards provisions.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Secondary strike action.
Old value:: Only closely related trade unions can walk out on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Current: Any trade union can go on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Proposed: Secondary strike action is illegal. Workers and unions can only go on strike for their own pay and conditions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:59:40, April 08, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Reform Act |
Message | Didn't you oppose those parties who put so many proposals in one bill? You should lead by example. |
Date | 09:52:29, April 08, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Reform Act |
Message | I want fewer proposals period. I'm actually going to add more to this, unfortunately the URP has to take these actions in response to the LP's constant annoying proposals. |
Date | 22:51:16, April 08, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Reform Act |
Message | I remember very well that you said that you wanted fewer proposals because you didn't like these types of bills with a lot of proposals. You are simply contradicting yourself. |
Date | 05:26:12, April 09, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Reform Act |
Message | I support reform so I don't do this - yes. Do you? |
Date | 00:47:21, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Pariah Idealism | To | Debating the Reform Act |
Message | don't support |
Date | 12:19:55, April 19, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Reform Act |
Message | We support 2 and 4 but not 1 and 3 and therfore we cant vote yes |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 17 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 131 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 2 |
Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
Random quote: “The people's war isn't just a war of destruction, it is also a war of construction. We will build new facilities, new hospitals, new farms. We will seek to improve the lives of the people around us. This struggle will be as costly as the struggle against the bourgeois army, and indeed will be even more damaging to the enemy.” - Comrade X, former Hulstrian politician |