We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: new bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2559
Description[?]:
| new bill |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: The private sector can set up gated communities.
Current: No gated communities are allowed.
Proposed: The government sets up gated communities.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but expels them from the country when discovered.
Current: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Proposed: Dealing with illegal aliens is left to local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government provision of legal aid to the accused.
Old value:: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state for defendants with low incomes.
Current: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state for defendants with low incomes.
Proposed: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:07:40, April 10, 2008 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the new bill |
| Message | wow sorry again, this was supposed to be Justice Reform Act... |
| Date | 20:29:31, April 10, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Capitalist Delegation | To | Debating the new bill |
| Message | We are in full disagreement with this bill. Firstly, we know to be true that immigration is an issue inherent to the central government. It is impractical and imprudent to leave to state governments. Secondly, we do not believe that gated communities are in any way or form a necessity to our nation, so the government should have nothing to do with them. Should the citizens desire to form gated communities, they should be free to do so, but there is no grounds for government intereference. Thirdly, we oppose the elimination of private lawyers, as it is an unecessary hinderance of the free market. James Lott Chairman Democratic Capitalist Delegation |
| Date | 01:47:04, April 11, 2008 CET | From | Radical Party | To | Debating the new bill |
| Message | We concur with the DCD on this. This bill is seriously flawed, and suggests a dangerous growth of the role of the State, which we oppose. - Kristian Donson - Leader of the Radical Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 95 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 264 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 41 |
| Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
| Random quote: "There are people in the world so hungry that God cannot appear to them except in the form of bread." - Mahatma Gandhi |